Cargo Ship Returns to Port After Pirate Attack; All Maritime Workers Safe
A cargo vessel that sailed from the Port of Houston and was attacked by Somali pirates, arrived at a Kenyan port with a U.S. Navy escort. Its 20-member maritime crew arrived safely and unharmed.
The ship, Liberty Sun, reached Mombassa last week. Last Wednesday, a gang of Somali pirates attacked the ship using rocket propelled grenades. The USS Bainbridge, which was carrying Captain Richard Phillips, the captain of the earlier hijacked Maersk Alabama, was called to help the crew of the Liberty Sun. However, by the time the Navy destroyer reached the area, the pilots had abandoned their plans. None of the crew members aboard the Liberty Sun were injured in the attacks, the vessel, however, sustained significant damage.
The bold attack that came so soon after the dramatic assault on the Maersk Alabama is proof that piracy in the waters off the Somali Coast is not just alive and kicking, but more aggressive than ever. Three of the pilots who attacked the Alabama were killed and the fourth was arrested. Enraged pirates have threatened to show no mercy to maritime crews in any vessel they attack from now on. Those words must be taken seriously. After all, since the three Somali pirates were killed, another armed gunmen managed to attack four other ships. To maritime attorneys, who work closely with injured workers, it is clear that this is not a minor law and order problem, but a grave maritime security issue.
President Barack Obama announced his intention to wipe out piracy, and maritime authorities issued warnings to ships to be alert to the dangers off the Somali coast. Maritime workers are not generally trained to deal with pirate attacks. It is obvious that security procedures on these vessels need to be enhanced, so workers and crew members are able to protect themselves if the vessel is intercepted by pirates. So far, there are very few answers to the piracy problem.
Maritime Safety
Maritime companies, meanwhile, are trying to find a balance that can keep their vessels and maritime workers safe, but their options are expensive. Some companies, including AP Roller Maersk, have begun to reroute part of their fleet to avoid these pirate infested waters. Other companies have not been so quick to follow suit. The detour is expensive and with a global economic crisis hitting the maritime transport industry, companies are not willing to rack up costs by rerouting vessels.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a maritime accident an experienced maritime attorney can help you recover the compensation you deserve. Contact a maritime injury attorney at Arnold & Itkin LLP to answer questions about your case.
The TWIC program was created due to the increased security threat to ports after 9/11. After the twin towers collapsed it became clear that our ports provided easy access to those who felt the need to harm Americans. The
Maritime safety procedures, if followed properly, can minimize the risk of accidents. Loads must be properly secured to prevent the risk of loads falling off of cranes and injuring workers. Maritime workers must also be trained about the risks they face while performing these activities. The importance of worker training and employee coordination cannot be underestimated. It is imperative that workers are trained to warn each other about the status of operations and any possible risk to those in the vicinity. Cranes must be fitted with alarm systems to warn workers that loads are being carried.
The crew included Colin Wright, a Galveston resident. The captain, Richard Philips, gave himself up as a hostage to the pirates in return for the safe release of his crew members. The ship safely returned to port and after a five day standoff, Phillips too was rescued when snipers killed three of the pirates and took one into custody.
The enhancements are expected to bring in more than $400 million in extra revenue for the port and could lead to the creation of more than 2,000 jobs. That is good news, not only for the port and its maritime workers, but also for the larger Galveston community.
It appears that the drilling company was negligent in providing a safe working environment for Jesus Perez. The opening of the platform that Perez fell into, according to the lawsuit, was the result of misplaced grading; the drilling company was responsible for making sure that such potential hazards were absent from the platform.
Galveston County Navigation District No.1 paid Texas Gulf Company $1.5 million to repair the bridge, but in early February the project was shut down due to shortage of funds. A local contractor Lamson Nguyen has agreed to take up the task of filling potholes on the bridge free of cost. However, the fact is that the 50-year-old bridge is in need of permanent repairs. The district has no funds available to continue the work and has requested $6 million from the
Coastal Maritime Stevedoring LLC is a stevedoring company based in Jacksonville, Florida; the company provides loading and unloading services for various kinds of cargo, in addition to warehouse and marine terminal management. The company is capable of handling over sized and unusual cargo, including: military cargo, water crafts, locomotives, cranes and construction machinery. Daise was apparently involved in transporting cargo for Coastal Maritime at the time of the accident.
According to the NTSB, Cosco Busan pilot, John Cota, bore most of the responsibility for the accident due to his failure to read radar data properly. Also, at the time of the accident, Cota was, reportedly, taking as many as 11 different medications for various conditions, ranging from alcoholism to depression. The Board vocalized the reaction of many
for close to 7.5 hours before help arrived. The investigation found that the accident was caused because of the pilots' slow response when the first engine failed. The board concluded that the slow response was probably due to high stress levels because of the timing of the crash - one week after hurricane Katrina made landfall. The chaotic conditions soon after Katrina hit caused delays in the communication network at Houston Helicopters Inc, the company that operated the helicopter. According to the Board's report, there were several violations at Houston Helicopters Inc. which contributed to the delayed rescue efforts. Post Katrina, other offshore helicopter operators serving drilling companies in the Gulf of Mexico made alternative arrangements, so they could continue supporting helicopter flights. Houston Helicopters Inc., however, failed to make any substitute arrangements. Instead, management at the company recommended that pilots use their own cell phones to transmit important flight information to the control center. The board also found that although Houston Helicopters Inc. had a record of 8 accidents, 3 incidents and at least 18 FAA surveillance violations, there were no follow ups made to check if the company was in compliance with rules regarding alternate methods of flight following procedures.